Thursday, June 28, 2007

These authorities do not have the intention to bear the responsibilities

I can't believe it!

Why like that one? The Tripartite Committee of the 'Cycling on the footway' study (ie, the LTA, Traffic Police and the Tampines Grassroots Organisations) are those who are in-charge in the study but yet they are not prepared to bear the responsibilities of any consequences that may arise after the decision is made.

As mentioned before (also refer to comment from the other general publics), the trial at Tampines may be ‘successful’ as it is being ‘monitored’.

In the end, someone must announce the result and give the ‘green light’ to go ahead to allow the cyclists on the footpath. By doing this, the ‘decision’ has made, and the ‘Tripartite Committee’ must be the one who announce it, right? Who else?

The statement: ‘the decision on whether to implement shared footways between cyclists and pedestrians will ultimately rest with the people themselves.’ is senseless and clearly an indication of trying to push the responsibilities to the general public. I really don’t believe I had read the letter like this from this group.

Another issue from the reply, which also link to the doubt we had for the Singapore Police Force.

Also refer to the earlier post regarding the ‘bus driver bullies’ case, will police take action when public call 999 or make a police report on the accident involved the cyclists on the footpath?

Why beating around the bushes and pushing us general public around like a fool? It only make us lost confident on the authorities. Sign… why like that one?



This is the reply by the Tripartite Committee of the 'Cycling on the footway' study.






These are the responses from the general public.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Accountability is as dirty as welfare in Singapore. As a matter of fact, they are unofficially banned in Singapore.

Have our million dollars Ministers take any responsibility for the fiasco their policies created? Have Ho Ching or the whole Temasek Board of Directors resign for Shin Corp, Suzhou Industrial Park fiasco?

The answer is a straight NO. Don't ask for the impossible because they have a good Mentor who has already gone past expiry date but yet pay himself million dollars salary and pension while serving the people of Singapore.

If you are not happy with the current situation in Singapore which IMHO will going to get worse, move your family and yourself out of Singapore. Our Government will not cry for you as ton of FTs will come to Singapore to replace you. Not to forget, you are just one of the 33% who had chosen not to vote for PAP in last GE.

Let's move on...

蒲悟先生 Benny PuWu said...

The problem is, that I am not the 33% as the place I stay was 'walk over'.

After all these issues, I am not sure which side should I vote, if I ever had a chance to do so again. Sad to say, hmmm... we don't have good enough opposition parties.

It will be a 'bad to worst', and what I want here is seeking the current situation to be from 'bad to good'... ok, dream on, and move on...